Justice James Omotosho of the Federal High Court in Abuja on Thursday began delivering judgment in the long-running terrorism trial of Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB) leader, Nnamdi Kanu — in his absence.
The court ordered that the proceedings continue without Kanu after the judge described the defendant’s conduct as unruly. This decision came shortly after Justice Omotosho dismissed three fresh motions filed by Kanu, which he ruled were without merit.
Kanu, who interrupted the court multiple times, insisted that the trial could not go on because he had not filed his final written address. He raised his voice, demanding to know the legal basis for the charges against him, shouting:
“Which law states that you can charge me on an unwritten law? Show me. Omotosho, where is the law? Any judgment declared in this court is complete rubbish.”
He further accused Justice Omotosho of bias and claimed the judge did not understand the law.
Following a brief recess, the prosecution led by Adegboyega Awomolo urged the court to proceed without the IPOB leader, arguing that his disruptive behaviour justified his removal.
Justice Omotosho ruled that while defendants have a constitutional right to be present during their trial, persistent misconduct can allow the court to continue in their absence.
“If a defendant misconducts himself or acts in an unruly manner during the course of his trial, his trial can be conducted in his absence,” he said, adding that the courtroom “is a temple of God.”
He also noted that Kanu had a history of similar behaviour and had previously indicated he would not present a defence. Thursday’s sitting, he stressed, was for judgment and possible sentencing.
After the order was issued, security operatives removed Kanu from the courtroom, and the judge proceeded with delivering the ruling.
